Xing-Wei CHEN and Jaewoo JOO
We borrow from psychological research and hypothesize that design
evaluation is not consistent but depends on two variables: evaluation mode
and knowledge level. We conducted two experiments to test our hypotheses.
We found in study 1 that participants evaluated form-superior products more
favorably in joint evaluation than in separate evaluation. We found in study 2
that this was found only among novice participants. Expert participants
favored function-superior products in joint evaluation. We discuss the
academic contributions and managerial implications of our findings.
PUBLISHED: Proceedings from the The 19th DMI: Academic Design Management Conference, 2014
DMI Members: To download the pdf of this publication, you need to log in, add it to your shopping cart, and check out. There will be no charge and the link(s) to the pdf(s) will be emailed to you.